Part 3 of “Youth & Religion” posts today

I used to love on television mini-series when they would say “And now the stunning conclusion of…” to promote the last of a series.

I’d like to think this last portion of the interview and series is the best. Of course, it’s where you’ll find the bulk of my commentary.

From here, you’re likely to see my article sweep through atheism for a while. Like I’ve said before I tend to run article in series (with articles on gay rights, Muslim rights, immigrant rights). Right now, I’m focused on atheism, agnosticism and skepticism. I wrote an article (scroll down) focused on skepticism earlier this month. This series on “Youth & Religion” featured an atheist and I’m looking for opportunities with Thanksgiving next week to feature a story on who are atheists thankful to – themselves? I will also be part of Examiner.com’s forthcoming series “War on Christmas”. Until then…click the link below to read the finale to the “Youth & Religion” series and interview. Thanks for reading.

Click here to read \”Youth & Religion, Part 2: For Better or Worse?\”

“Youth & Religion” What does an Atheist & Catholic Seminary Student Have in Common?

It actually may surprise you how much the two have in common. At least the two Millennials I interviewed for Part 2 in my series. Atheism is the fastest growing religion in the U.S. and Catholicism is the fastest declining. I thought it’d be interesting to the get the perspective  from two members of the Millennial generation. It’s actually a pretty informative interview. In fact, there’s so much content (6 pages) that the second half of the interview won’t be posted until tomorrow.

Click here to read the \”Youth & Religion Interview: It\’s Complicated\”

Youth & Religion in America Part 1; Who are the Millennials?

Part 1 of my series of articles – “Youth & Religion” posted today. Part 2 which begins an in-depth interview with an Agnostic Atheist and Catholic seminary student who is studying to be a priest will begin tomorrow. Part 3 which concludes the interview with the two will post on Friday. I’ve been working on this interview for about a month and I’m glad it’s finally coming out. I think the insight both of the interviews give is enlightening about just how unified we actually are. That’s all I will hint at.  It’s something I hope people find both informative and engaging.

Click here to read \”Youth & Religion Part 1: Who are the Millennials?

Doubt & Skepticism vs. FAITH

I’ve read some very critical essays on Mother Teresa that call her a hypocrite and a fraud for having doubts in her faith during some dark times in her life. What the skeptics don’t understand is that her doubts, her human reaction, only made her a stronger example of her faith. That through her doubts, she remained faithful to her convictions is exactly why she is to be cherished. You don’t make a commitment to work with the poorest of the world and not have doubts. Remaining steadfast to your commitment to God through doubt is exactly what is to be admired.

Faith is a commitment beyond our doubts and our skepticism. Dictionary.com defines faith this way:

A confidence or trust in a person or thing; belief that is not based on proof (He had faith that the hypothesis would be substantiated by fact); belief in anything, as a code of ethics, standards of merit, etc.; the obligation of loyalty or fidelity to a person, promise, engagement.

As humans, it is in our nature to doubt things. The older we get the more skeptical we become. The loss of innocence primarily comes from the fact that many things have happened to us that have lead to our doubt in the first place. We doubt because our experiences tell us we know better. To have faith in something is to stare those doubts down and tell ourselves that even though our experiences tell us not to believe – we do it anyway.

It doesn’t take a mass of brain superiority to be skeptical. Taking a stand against something easy to doubt isn’t empowering. I’d actually argue people’s skepticism is far more about fear and pride than anything else and that is arguable and inferior trait.

What is far more superior in my opinion is to look at what is doubtful and believe anyway. Faith is not easy. It’s a difficult process that goes against what our own human nature tells us. We can easily talk ourselves out of most things. It takes commitment and absolute devotion to remain faithful. It’s practically a supernatural response to remain faithful in the sight of all that tells us not to be and that is what made Mother Teresa someone to admire.

I’m extremely tired of hearing both celebrities and pundits qualify that religion is for the stupid. This idea that it is far more intelligent to not believe in God simply because doubt is prevalent really isn’t that mind-blowing of an idea. Just because something can’t be determined by science or fact or reason or rational (however you want to call it) doesn’t mean it isn’t true. I can rationalize that I am handsome. I could even conduct a survey to show that my handsomeness is factual. It would then be a proven fact by scientific research that I am handsome therefore it is reasonable to believe it. What this example proves is you can pretty much prove or disprove just about anything with the right combination of “facts”. Believing beyond proof and doubt is what makes faith such a dynamic principle. Something some people just can’t comprehend.

A Memorable Speech on this Election Day

It’s finally here – election day. We can finally say good-bye to all the political ads, mailers and robo-calls. In a week in which the President of all people called Republicans the “enemy,” I thought this excerpt from a Presidential inaugural speech speaks to the events of this day.

We can not remove our respective sections from each other nor build an impassable wall between them. A husband and wife may be divorced and go out of the presence and beyond the reach of each other, but the different parts of our country can not do this. They can not but remain face to face, and intercourse, either amicable or hostile…This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.

In our present differences, is either party without faith of being in the right? If the Almighty Ruler of Nations, with His eternal truth and justice, be on your side or the other, that truth and that justice will surely prevail by the judgment of this great tribunal of the American people…While the people retain their virtue and vigilance no Administration by any extreme of wickedness or folly can very seriously injure the Government in the short space of four years…Intelligence, patriotism, Christianity, and a firm reliance on Him who has never yet forsaken this favored land are still competent to adjust in the best way all our present difficulty.

In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue…The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. You have no oath registered in heaven to destroy the Government, while I shall have the most solemn one to “preserve, protect, and defend it.”

We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.

Abraham Lincoln, 1861, from his first inaugural address to the nation. Beneath an unfinished Capital dome, Lincoln spoke before a divided nation and asked for civility.  While our nation remains divided, we must not give into the worst of ourselves and create further divisiveness. Today, you can go and make your voice heard. Nothing gets better from inaction. You can make a difference.

Change Hearts, Not Laws: How the Battle to Overturn Roe v. Wade Has Hurt Religion

This is not about being pro-choice or pro-life. It’s about how the desire to overturn Roe v. Wade’s legal precedence by pro-life advocates has done little to win support for religion in general. We’re an extremely divisive nation and at the heart of that divisiveness is fear – the fear of rights being taken away by other Americans. If you look at the mosque near ground zero debate both sides are in fear. One side is in fear that their nation is in jeopardy of being forever changed from its traditional founding. The other side is fearful that the rights of a minority are being challenged and if not stopped here where will it end. Whether it’s restricting abortion, a mosque in Manhattan, same-sex marriage or any other described right, when you advocate taking perceived rights away from people, its viewed as oppressive and those feeling oppressed only dig their feelings in deeper to ensure their position remains firm. The “oppressed” look unfavorably at the opposition and animosity builds up against not just the single principle being debated but for the fundamental views being expressed by the opposition.

Click here to Read Entire Article

 

A WordPress.com Website.

Up ↑